Thursday, July 27, 2006

第二天(21/12/05):金光闪闪佛光山,闷闷得莲池潭和浪漫爱河

早上起床后跟芬到一楼吃自助早餐,不算很丰富,所以只吃了两碗粥就和芬步行到车站准备搭车上佛光山。虽然我们已经照着地图走了,但是还是绕了一大圈,不过不要紧咯,就但这沿途欣赏早上高雄的街道,我发现早上的高雄还蛮冷清的,可能是因为很多店都还没开始营业吧。经过一路上不停的问人,终于找到了高雄火车站。我发现台湾人尤其是南部的都很乐于助人,只要我们有什么问题,他们都很愿意帮忙。不怪的很多人都说南部人比较热情。
到了火车站,就到服务台询问,在他们的指示下走到了隔壁的客运站买票,他们那里的交通系统和我们的有点不一样,客运就像是我们的bus express,长途的,但是有些路程会沿路载客,一种则是真的走高速公路的,而且他们的客运是一间公司自己有自己的车站,不像我们的都是同在一个车站内。我们要搭上佛光山的属于前者,买了车票,因为时间还没到,所以就跑去找服务台介绍的ALOHA客运,问问关于要明天上台中的时间,然后才走回去等巴士。
巴士还算很准时,可能因为我们是外国人,所以服务员就会提醒我们要上哪一部车,上了车后才发现原来车上有一位“鬼佬”,后来他问我们是不是也是去同样一个destination,因为他怕和工作人员有点语言不通,上错车就惨咯。。。车开了才发现原来整架车只有我们三人。闲谈之下才知道他来自德国,因为对佛教很有兴趣,所以想上佛光山居住几天。一路上巴士都有继续沿路载客,但是很奇怪的是一路上上上下下的都是老人家,那些年轻人去了哪里?真的觉得有点奇怪。。。走着走着,巴士就穿梭了很多的小巷,我还发现了这些地方都很有乡下的味道,让我看到了城市繁荣的另一面。大约一个小时后,我们就到了佛光山,也跟那位德国人道别了。佛光山真的很大很大,于是我们就照着建议行程开始参观。首先先到了石窟,里面有很多的佛像,我们还在里面添了许愿卡,就继续参观五百罗汉。
在我们拍照的同时,我们遇到了一位新加波人,他一个人来高雄公干,还主动帮我们两人拍照,跟我们要了email说会寄给我们,过后就分开继续跑,我们也就继续参观大佛像和大雄宝殿,没想到在参观完大雄宝殿后竟然让我们从遇那位德国人,既然那么有缘,那就应该拍照留念咯。参观完了舍利殿,在殿的大堂竟然又遇到那位新加波人,但是因为他赶着去参拜舍利,所以也不好意思要他跟我们拍照,心想如果能遇到他第三次,那我们就会和他合照,参观了舍利殿,也代表我们参观的七七八八了,所以就打算搭巴士回到高雄市。。。大约5点,我们就到车站了,接着就再搭公车(就像我们这里的rapid kl)到莲池潭。其实对我来说,莲池潭只是一个旅行社会带游客去参观的地方,因为不用入门费,只是拍照的景点而已。。。对我来说,是不这么特别也没有什么值得参观的点,所以我们意思意思拍了几张照片就打算走了,打算去下一个点。高雄的公车对我来说还蛮先进的,因为如果你有手机,你可以利用它来查公车还有多久会到你这个站,可以省掉等的时间,还有公车上是有电视可以看,还有一个提示灯是会显示公车即将转左还是转右,那让你有所准备,还蛮贴心的吧。。。(马来西亚不知几时才有呢?)
过了大约50分钟,我们又回到了火车站。。。没想到一下车,竟然被我们发现了那位新加波人,心想这次真的是遇到第三次啦,很有缘吧。。。但是因为看到他时他已经走远了,所以我们也追不上去,正要离开时,没想到他竟然又往我们的方向走回来,我们见机不可失,就快点走上去meet他,他也很意外会遇到我们,有时候缘分这回事真的很奇妙,它让你在对的时间对的地方,就在那个timing遇上了。后来他知道我们要到爱河,他也很想去,于是我们就到车站先吃个晚餐然后搭taxi过去,他还请我们吃晚餐,又省了一笔。

爱河顾名思义就是听起来就是一个很浪漫的地方,其实爱河主要的卖点就是浪漫的环境,在一条河上有七座桥,然后用不同的灯光来营造浪漫的感觉,给人去谈情的地方咯,至于我们就纯欣赏咯,到此一游嘛。我们搭上了爱河船游爱河,一路上都会有专人讲解的,让你了解多一点。过后我们还到“河边漫波”喝茶吃蛋糕,天气有点冷,所以我们是在寒冷的冬天然后吹着暖气在那里聊天一直到差不多11点才搭taxi回去。。。因为很夜了,所以他先叫司机先把我们送回酒店才送他,不用我们从车站走回去,真的人好好哦。。。
我们从吃晚餐到搭taxi都是他付钱,难怪芬说我们真的是出门遇贵人了。道别了他,我们就回房收拾,因为明天就要到台中了。这两天在高雄的收获还算蛮丰富的,至少它让我体验了台湾当地人的生活方式,我觉得这是跟团没有办法体验到的。在佛光山的时候都有为自己,家人和朋友祈福,希望他们都过得很好和平安,也希望我接下来的日子都顺顺利利咯。。。。

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

第一天(20/12/05):我的旅程开始了!

一早起来就准备吃早餐然后去车站下亚庇和燕芬会合。大约1。45pm,燕芬的妹妹就送我们到机场 check in,不知道是不是因为搭太多飞机的关系,好像有点麻木了,所以都不会有那种很兴奋的感觉,只有以期待和平静的心去面对接下来的旅程。飞机还算准时起飞, 但是很失望的竟然是亏马航还拿过最佳的国际服务舱奖,那些空姐的服务态度还真的比国内的差,其中一位说话有气无力,还没告诉我们有什么餐就问我们要吃什 么,坐了这么多次飞机,这还是头一遭,要说明我坐得不是头等舱哦,不可以点菜的。 还有就是叫她拿一杯白开水竟然拿了10分钟,还要三番四次催她才拿来,真的很想投诉她的,但是看她的服务态度,很像是第一次,没有经验,所以也就算了。飞 机的乘客不多,差不多百多位而且都是台湾人居多,好像没有什么像我们的外国人。飞机终于在大约6pm降落高雄小港机场了,我们在通往custom的中途先 上个厕所还有拍照,初来报到嘛,当然是先拍照咯。到了custom,那个官员竟然脸黑黑,这样更让游客对他们国家的第一印象大打折扣。

庆幸的是行李出的满快的,也可能是我们花了很多时间拍照吧,就在机场那里把所有的旅游册子不管有没有用都放进背包,然后出到闸口,就看到有个男人拿着写着我名字牌子在等,他应该就是酒店派来接我们的司机。看别人的名字就看得多了,看自己名字的还是第一次。

之前听到飞机广播说高雄现在是21度,心想应该会很冷,可是出到去了竟然不是这么一回事,至少我还不用穿冷衣。。。从飞机上望下来的高雄夜空,觉得它有点 金光闪闪,很漂亮。。。来载我们的司机也很friendly,一面沿途跟我们聊天和介绍。在会酒店的路途中,发现这个城市有点像香港,后来进到市中心,燕 芬觉得台湾人的驾驶技术真的很厉害,可以随时从这个方向转去对面,难怪路上都不见有像我们这边的分割道,所以过马路真得要很小心。

大约过了半小时,我们就到酒店了,接待处的小姐很亲切,也对我们会讲华语感到很惊讶,原来他们以为我们马来西亚人都只说马来文和英文,所以在我们还没到的 时候他们就很担心要跟我们说英文,因为他们英文不是很好,怕不能跟我们沟通,听到我们会说华语,他们马上释怀了,还一直问我们她们讲话的速度可不可以。拿 了钥匙上了房间把背包放下,房间不算大,有冷热饮水器,电脑化冰箱,还有平面电视,好像还不错哦。。

梳洗和休息一下就打算出门走走,我选这间酒店的另一个原因是它蛮近车站和夜市,步行几分钟就可以到,那就可以省下一笔交通费。因为也差不多8点了,所以我 们就步行到附近的六和夜市,这是在高雄满出名的其中之一,它有点像茨厂街,马路两排都是摊子,但是只有人行,汽车不能驶入,有吃的和卖东西的,不同的是那 里比较干净,而且到处都看到华语字。。。 街道不长,所以我们就先从街头走到街尾,看到watson就跑去买lip balm,看到7-eleven就去买ic card打回家,我还发现了一种很high tech公共电话叫多媒体电话,你可以利用它上网,收电邮,打电话等等。。。不知道马来西亚几时才会有呢?打了电话报平安,我们就继续逛,来到一个摊位, 他们是卖一种所谓的爱情海海盐,主要的功用是去角质,海盐加入了不同的香精呈现不同的颜色摆在那里,你可以随你自己的喜欢装满一个特备的瓶子,现场你还可 以用盐来洗手试试看,我们试过了发现手还真的有变滑, 那两个工读生还说之前还有个马来西亚人来买了2公斤回去。。。不知道是不是真的。。一瓶是NT300,后来我们决定一人买一瓶,因为两瓶送一小瓶,他们还 有一些是包装的,我们也买了5包准备送给朋友,然后还wat他们送多一包给我们,因为5包不能分,之前的aunty买4瓶他们都不送,但是我们就等他们走 了在缠着他们送,最后当然是成功啦。。。女人就是女人,没办法,买一棵菜就是要拿多一点葱。。。嘿嘿。。

过后就跑去吃担仔面,小小的一碗也要NT25,几口就可以吃完了,我只吃了一碗,尝过就算,还有买了烧鸡翅,继续又试了蚵仔煎再打包草莓和圆汤会酒店吃。 其实圆汤就是我们这里的汤圆,只是他们在汤里可以给你选加红豆,绿豆进去而已。。。打包后就慢慢走回酒店咯,在没上房之前先到酒店的coffee  shop叹一杯茶或咖啡,因为是免费送的,当然要喝咯,真小家哦。。。。。回房后梳洗了就大略计划明天的行程和开始看看台湾的电视,总共有50机台这么多,真的是眼花缭乱,但是有十多台是购物频道来的,所以可以略过。。。夜了,要睡了。。养足精神去继续明天的行程。。。。

Sunday, July 23, 2006

My Travel Journal 勇敢走出去:我人生的第一次背包游

前言


其实,一直以来都很喜欢收集旅行的资料,总希望自己有一天能够踏足当地,去看看到底是不是像书上形容得这么漂亮。而其中最希望能去的地方是台湾,这也许是受到我爱看的书影响,而且在印象中台湾也有很多美食,这也可能是受到很多台湾美食节目的影响吧,所以一直都很希望可以去一趟。但是一直以来,家里人都比较把我们这些孩子当温室里的小花,都非常保护,虽然我已经只身在外求学多年,但是如果提到要自己背包 游,他们应该不会赞成,所以虽然这个想法一直都在,但是都没有付梓与行,直到我读完了专业文凭,就快要踏入社会大学了,心里就想:“这次无论如何都要在做 工之前去玩一趟才对得起自己”;p,而且也这么巧,在和燕芬(我的中学朋友)聊电话的时候也聊到原来她也是很想到台湾玩,只是一直以来我们都没有聊到这个 话题,所以我也不知道,加上她家人也不会放心她一个人过去,所以既然我们一拍即合,于是我就着手开始准备去台湾的事情。自己决定了之后,还要通过家人的那 关,我知道爸一定不会反对,因为他最开通,所以会大力支持,至于阿姨,也一路来都很支持我,现在问题就在妈妈那边,要过了她那一关,那一切就可以搞定了。 后来,因为燕芬的家人知道她会有伴,所以也答应了。于是我就跟妈商量,可能因为她认识燕芬,而且大家都有伴,所以也蛮爽快答应了。

我的准备功夫

决定了后,那下一步就是开始做资料收集,之前都有去旅行的经验,虽然不是跟团,但是因为都是阿姨在做资料收集,所以一切都包办好,我只是负责参与和给一点 意见,这样一切就可以成行了,而且以前去的地方都会有亲戚,所以他们都会帮我们安排。但是这次不同,这次只有我们两个女生,燕芬也没有出国的经验,所以我 身负重任(人家的女儿叻),要尽量的做足功课,这样才不会手忙脚乱,而且有了周全的准备,那家人也会比较放心。台湾是一个蛮多人都会自助去的地方,而 且各方面都很完善,所以在找资料方面就不会面对很大的问题,只是需要时间去多看和去筹备而已。基本上我的资料搜集也是大部分人都会做的事情,不外是上上 网,参考杂志,旅游书籍等。。。之前又买了一本环球旅游专介绍台湾的,所以就用那做为蓝本,恰巧也遇到了matta fair,所以就去一趟,拿了很多的行程,和最重要的事去台湾的摊子把所有跟台湾有关的leaflet,不管有用没用全部拿回家,没有在matta fair买机票是因为我的起航地点是kk,他们的全部是kl,所以我只拿资料,没有帮衬。。。

另外就是跑到书店参考那边的旅游书,最主要是美食的部分,看看那里有好吃的。。。嘿嘿。。
其实不是很满意我们马来西亚的书店,这方面的书真的不是很多,可能需求量不高吧,还是因为很多人都像我这样,只看不买。。。(还好意思讲)。。。但是 我觉得很多都不update,所以不值得买咯。。。还是参考网上会比较好和update。和燕芬讨论了几个我们都想去的地方,然后我就着手开始找寻相关方 面的资料,从住宿,交通,机票和旅游相关景点,因为要避免花了很多冤枉钱和走冤枉路,还要符合经济效应,所以资料越详细就越好,而要达到这个目的,就是要 很勤力的做功课,上网和策划好。。。


参考了旅行社的行程,也想到这是第一次游台湾,所以就尽可能可以浏览比较多一点的地方,而且也避免走回头路,所以我就决定要从高雄进,台北出,从南玩到 北。。途中就经台中和日月潭到台北。。。还想要太鲁阁国家公园,但是到临出发就排不定太鲁阁国家公园的行程,所以就先搁着,打算见一步走一步。以我以往旅 行的经验,玩的地方可以慢慢计划,但是必须先解决住的问题。因为是第一次自己跑,所以不敢take high risk,去到才找住的地方,所以一定要在还没出发之前把酒店订好,这样也让家人比较安心。台北的住宿因为问了神隐,所以相信他的经验,决定台北就在 taipei hostel落脚。但是高雄和台中因为去自助的朋友不多,所以也就不敢冒冒然住hostel,心想既然都省下了台北的住宿,那其它的住酒店也ok。。。

至于日月潭,为了想尝试一下住民宿的经验,所以就收集了这方面的资料咯。。所以在接近起飞的1个星期前,就把高雄的酒店先订下来,找了很多资料,看了很多 feedback,最后订下了喜悦商务大饭店,以来因为很多人对他的评价不错,二来价钱也ok,还有他们也有到机场接送服务,所以也可以省去一笔taxi fees,比较了网络上的价钱,就在eztravel用信用卡缴付,如意算盘打得很响哦。但是在订住宿的时候信用卡被reject了,后来打了电 话去clasrify,再订才过关。。。然后在出发的前两天再打电话到酒店跟他们confirm我的booking和告诉她们我的flight number和名字咯。。。至于taipei hostel,我在三个月前已经定下了一间双人房,而日月潭和台中的住宿,就因为怕旅程会有变数。所以就只把资料找齐,以备不时之需。。。我建议大家可以 用这个方法,以来不会手忙脚乱,二来也比较有安全感,因为筛选过的都是别人评价过不错的住宿环境。

搞定了住宿,接下来就是要打电话通知银行,告诉他们我会到国外旅行的日期,以免到时候信用卡不能过,这样就会很paiseh了。至于行程安排的部分,以往 旅行的经验都让我觉得人在旅途会有很多的变数,所以我只是大略安排我们的行程,简略的列出要去的地方,和相关的资料就可以了,详情就到了那里再安排和计 划。另外我要到台湾的另一大目的,就是寻找美食。当然这门功课就不能少,我参考了台湾必尝的小食,把他们的地址全部list down,如果你也想试试看那里的美食,我建议你最好像我这样,把详细的地址列出来,什么路什么巷和什么号,不然就有的你找,因为没有详细的地址找起来真 的是非常困难的。。。切记咯。。。

还有就是要把机票,护照,行程都复印两份,一份带去,和正式的分开放,另一份就留给家人,以防不时之需,也可以让他们大概知道你的行程,比较放心。还要把所有紧急事故的联络电话都写起来放好带去。

最后,当然就是行李的问题,说明是背包嘛,但让要买一个背包带去才像样咯,因为带了一个大背包,所以出外跑的时候就要用肩包,为了这趟旅行,还真的特地去 买了一个converse的包包和一台数码相机,真的是大阵仗和大出血,没有办法咯,为了要多拍一些照片回来(朋友的命令),这是一定要的啦。至于衣服方 面,因为我们过去的时候是冬天,大概是17度这样,但是因为没有太大的概念,所以也不知道是不是要带很厚的衣服过去,因为我没有过冬天的衣服,所以就带了 两件外套,心想如果真得不够,去到再买吧,因为听说很便宜。还有就是为了防止漏带东西,建议大家list down所有必带的东西,向我就准备了一张“收拾行李要领”,在收拾的时候就做check list,那就万无一失啦。。。是不是?


小小插曲:出发前感冒了!

从来很少病得我竟然在出发前的两个星期前的了严重的咳嗽和伤风,以往我的了感冒只要吃一点要和多休息就会没事,可是竟然没想到这次的竟然可以拖那么久,吃了很多药都不见得有改善,没有办法咯,病了还是要跑,只是就会多带一些药过去,按时吃应该问题就不大的。而燕芬也因为怕水土不服,所以也带了一些中药过去旁身。没想到最后还真得用上了。。。。

Saturday, July 08, 2006

My Destiny

My Destiny
Katharine McPhee America Idol 2006

I have always dreamed of this
I'll admit there was something I missed
wondering if this is for real
every mistake every wrong turn
everytime i lost my way
let me to
moment of bliss tonight

with you, finally I can break free
with you, some changing in my destiny
dream come true, its so funny now that I see
how different life turned out to be

You were always by my side
That you believed in me was enough reason why
I didn't stop, i didn't give up
even if i sometimes lost hope

I did my best, and I am blessed
in love

with you, finally I can break free
with you, some changing in my destiny dream come true, its so funny now that I see
how different life turned out to be

can I get any higher
tell me
does it get any stronger
I always dreamed
that I made it through
never could have done it without you

With you.... yeah.... I can break free

some changing in my destiny
dream come true, its so funny now that I see
how different life turned out to be.
(3x)

I realised that it's my destiny

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Really like this songs by Katherine,even though she did not get the America
Idol,but she is the America Idol of my choice,this songs is one of her singles
which is just debut in US,at the same time,i also prefer her version of
"Somewhere over the raindow",both songs can be listen inside my music box
at the left hand side...just try to share it with all my friends....

Monday, July 03, 2006

Tomorrow can be too late!

If you're mad with someone, and nobody's there to fix the situation... You fix it .

Maybe today, that person still wants to be your friend .

And if u don't, tomorrow can be too late .

If you're in love with somebody , but that person doesn't know...
tell her/him. Maybe today, that person is also in love with you .

And if you don't say it, tomorrow can be too late.

If you really want to kiss somebody... kiss her/him. Maybe that person wants a kiss from you, too .

And if you don't kiss her/him today, tomorrow can be too late .

If you still love a person that you think has forgotten you...

tell her/him. Maybe that person have always loved you.

And if you don't tell her/him today , tomorrow can be too late.

If you need a hug of a friend... ask her/him for it. Maybe they need it more than you do.

And if you don't ask for it today, tomorrow can be too late.


If you really have friends
who you appreciate... tell them. Maybe they appreciate you as well.

That if you don't and they leave or go far away today , tomorrow can be too late.



If you love your parents, and never had the chance to show them... do it
. Maybe you have them there to show them how you feel.

That if you don't and they leave today , then tomorrow can be too late.

Saturday, June 24, 2006

Is 3000 enough?

Let's to do some calculations here. In Malaysia the average family income is RM3000 (Father works,mother doesnt). I understand there are a lot of families whose income don't reach RM3000, but, to make things simple, lets take RM3000 as the figure. ok la right?

Okay, let's start rolling with a family which has
Papa, Mama, 1 daughter and 1 son. ..

Calculation starts...

Electricity and water bil RM100 (no aircond, no home theatre, no water heater k?)
Telekom and Handphone bil RM100 (cannot make a lot of calls one you know? NO Streamyx also)
Meal for the whole happy family RM775 (3 meals on RM25/day, RM25 for 4 persons????)
Papa makan/teh tarik during working hours RM155 (RM5/day, RM5 can eat what?)
Car repayment RM400 (a proton saga aeroback, 7 years repayment)
Petrol RM300 (Living in City, Jam) Go to work, bring son to school, only can afford one car running.

Insurance RM650, (kids, wife and myself).
House repayment RM750 (Low cost housing repayment for 30 years, retired still have to work to pay house!)
Tuition RM80 (got that cheap meh?? No, I don't think so)
Older children pocket money @ school RM20 (RM1/day, eat bread??)
School fees RM30 (enough ah??)
School books and etc etc. RM100 (always got extra to pay in school)
Younger children milk powder RM50 (cannot have the DHA, BHA, PHA one, expensive) Miscellaneous RM100 (shampoo, rice, sauce,toilet paper) oh wait!!!

I have to stop here, so... No Astro, no movie @ cinema, no DVD, no CD, no online, cannot KFC, cannot Mc Donald, cannot go Park walk during weekend(petrol expensive), no chit chat on phone with grandparents, and etc... Let's use a calculator to total up... RM3610 already.. EPF belum potong, income tax lagi,........ oledi more by RM610...

Our Deputy PrimeMinister ask us to change lifestyle? How tochange? Don't eat? Don't work? Don't sendchildren to school and study? Besides that, I
believe in Malaysia population, there are lots ofRakyat Malaysia which still don't earnRM3000/month!!!

What is this? Ini lah Malaysia Boleh.. Sorry.. it should be Malaysians Boleh, because we're still able to survive !!



Wednesday, May 24, 2006

《 人生價值 》

有一個出家弟子跑去請教一位很有智慧的師父,他跟在師父的身邊,天天問同樣的問題:「師父啊,什麼是人生真正的價值?」問得師父煩透了。
有一天,師父從房間拿出一塊石頭,對他說:「你把這塊石頭,拿到市場去賣,但不要真的賣掉,只要有人出價就好了,看看市場的人,出多少錢買這塊石頭?」弟 子就帶著石頭到市場,有的人說這塊石頭很大,很好看,就出價兩塊錢;有人說這塊石頭,可以做稱鉈,出價十塊錢;結果大 家七嘴八舌,最高也只出到十塊錢。弟子很開心的回去,告訴師父:「這塊沒用的石頭,還可以賣到十塊錢,真該把它賣了。」
師父說:「先不要賣,再把它拿去黃金市場賣賣看,也不要真的賣掉。」弟子就把這石頭,拿去黃金市場賣,一開始就有人出價一千塊,第二個人出一萬塊,最後被出到十萬元。

弟子興沖沖跑回去,向師父報告這不可思議的結果。
師父對他說:「把石頭拿去最貴、最高級的珠寶商場去估價。」
弟子就去了。第一個人開價就是十萬,但他不賣,於是二十萬,三十萬,一直加到後來對方生氣了,要他自己出價。他對買家說,師父不許他賣,就把石頭帶了回去,對師父說:「這塊石頭居然被出價到數十萬。」
師父說:「是呀!我現在不能教你人生的價值,因為你一直在用市場的眼光在看待你的人生。人生的價值,應該是一個人心中,先有了最好的珠寶商的眼光,才可以看到真正的人生價值。」

我們的價值,不在於外面的評價,而是在我們給自己的定價。我們每一個人的價值,都是絕對的。堅持自己崇高的價值,接納自己,磨勵自己。給自己成長的空間,我們每個人都能成為「無價之寶」。

工作就像雕一座冰宮,在燈光照耀下,五彩繽紛、光耀奪目,但水晶冰宮最後總會融化。專心從事工作,是非常好的,但是如果心情太過沈重,就會很累、壓力很 大,所以,要用雕冰的心情,輕鬆愉快地完成,不要太執著、太認真,但是要用心雕刻。工作時用心、認真,但不必執著其結果。

***************************************************************************
We should find our value ourselves,when we recognised who are we,then people recognised us as what we bahave and act,therefore finding our own value is important,we exist in this world,so we need to just keep going on searching ourselves and make ourselves precious in our own eye and others eye,i think we need to give ourselves recognition before we expecting others giving us.

Just talk to a girl who wants and decided to study ACCA after her degree in local university which she think she doesn't like what she studied before,but her brother's friends who is an ACCA Affiliate just start pouring cold water on her,told her that don't bother to try coz ACCA is very difficult,how come they just simply do that without giving people a chance to try......

When we decided something and we think it is appropriate,we should just try and go for it,we decide our own destiny and also we choose our own life...

Sunday, May 21, 2006

Life is unpredictable!

生命奋斗中最让人刻骨铭心的是遇上困难的时刻,
就犹如晴和的日子里,
突然间吹来了满天的乌云,
突然间来了一阵狂风暴雨,唏哩哗啦的,
打破了人的计划以及生活流程,
然而,当着风雨到来时,
总不能说避开就算数,
风雨会有它的影响,后果,
喜欢不喜欢,总要去面对它,
感受它所带来的冲击,
只要肯坦然的去面对,应变,
再大的风雨总还是会过去,
人生的困难也是这样,
不管它来得多么出乎我们的意料之外,
不管它怎样阻碍着我们的前进,
它总会过去的,
信念要坚强,不可熄灭。

**********************************************************************

Sometime life is just unpredictable,when you think all the problems are settled,
then unexpectedly other problem will come after you,and things won't stop there,
you need to face it,you need to accept it and you need to handle it well......
problem just can't solve itself,you need to solve it and don't let it affect you anymore.
Yes,everything will be over,just giving it and yourself enough time,then you will be fine.
Determination must be strong and we must stay strong.I hope i can handle it and i know
i can.Wish me good luck!

Monday, May 15, 2006

ACCA June 06 Exam Tips

Dear Friends,

The following are the tips that i get from the net and summarized it. However i wish you to take note that all the tips are based on the lecturer's best guess, it is just used for reference and should not be over-concentrated and over-relied.

Finally,accept my greatest wishes in your coming exam and wish that everyone of you pass the papers!

Ching

WARNING: Tips are no substitute for revision!

June 2006 Exam Tips


Paper 1.3 Managing People


  • Read examiner’s latest article “Management and Supervision”
  • Role of Management/Supervisor
  • Recruitment and Selection – a question in every previous exam to date
  • Motivation and Leadership
  • Effective Communication Practices -counselling
  • Authority, responsibility and delegation
  • Classical and modern theories of management
  • Objective setting; performance indicators; Management by Objectives
  • Individual, Groups and Team behaviour
  • Training and Development
  • Management of Diversity/Equal Opportunities

Paper 2.1 IS

Managing information systems

· Business Strategy and IS/IT alignment

· Delivering information systems – accounting issues

· Project initiation – Project Manager roles and responsibilities

· Project planning – Gantt charts

· Outsourcing

· Legacy systems

· Terms of reference

· Staff roles and responsibilities

Designing information systems

· The information systems development process – Waterfall and Spiral models

· Modelling user requirements – entity life history

· Software package selection – ITT

· External design – User friendly systems,prototyping ,data capture,4GL

· Modelling: business process model; business event model

· Invitation to tender

Evaluating information systems

· Technical IS requirements – Housekeeping and audit trails

· Implementation issues and implementation methods

· Quality assurance in the management and development process – V model

· Relationship of development processes and quality

· Security: physical security; passwords; validation; encryption

· Changeover methods

· Maintenance

ACCA 2.4 Financial Management and Control

· Investment Appraisal; NPV to include tax and inflation, other methods of appraisal (possibly IRR) and possibly capital rationing

· Sources of finance

· Performance measures

· Working capital (probably stock management but possibly debtor management)

· Modern costing techniques

· Sensitivity analysis, risk and uncertainty

· Long term finance and gearing

· Budgeting

· Variance analysis – possibly to include mix and yield variances

ACCA Paper 2.5

Q1:Consolidated balance sheet and/or income statement with one subsidiary and possibly an associate or joint venture.

-adjustments fair values, unrealised profit on inventories or tangible assets, cancellation of intragroup trading, goods/cash in transit, pre-acquisition dividends.

Q2:Preparation/restatement of an income statement and/or balance sheet.

-adjustments for current tax, depreciation, interest and dividends. Other adjustments may relate to debt factoring or other substance over form issues, leases, financial/capital instruments, revaluations, share issues, inventory (stock) valuation, government grants or deferred tax. There may be further disclosure requirements re discontinued operations, movement in reserves or an earnings per share calculation.

Q3:Written question examining theoretical/conceptual areas or accounting standards. This could be on construction contracts, leases, provisions, inflation, intangible assets, accounting policies or substance over form issues with reference to the Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements (Statement of Principles).

Q4:Interpretation and/or cash flow statements. There could also be a discursive part on why, for example, segment or discontinued operations disclosures are useful.

Q5:No specified format or content and will cover other areas of the syllabus. The examiner frequently includes a 'mixed bag' question, which examines three or four different accounting standards.

Possibilities this sitting include: deferred tax, construction contracts, segment reporting, events after the balance sheet date, governments grants, financial/capital instruments, discontinued operations or substance over form issues.

ACCA 2.6 Exam Tips

  • Management Letter on Purchases/Payroll/Computer Controls,very similar in substance to that produced by an external auditor
  • Non-current (fixed) assets, bank/cash and receivables (debtors)
  • Systems and controls –the purchases/payables and sales/receivables systems looking the most likely.
  • Planning and risk assessment
  • Professional ethics – Independence and Confidentiality
  • Audit/ Assurance Reports –Audit Work and Audit Reporting regarding Going Concern
  • Parts of questions –fraud, management representations, audit regulation, materiality, e-technology
  • Corporate Governance - Role of Audit Committees
  • Internal Audit - compared with External Audit / role in Risk Management

ACCA 3.1 Exam Tips

Q1 & Q2 :

· Risk assessment, risk management and audit strategy.

· Assurance services - prospective financial information, or reporting on non-financial information.

· Control suggestion and/or evaluation

· Audit evidence on Paper 2.5 accounting areas (see also Q3 suggestions)

· Group audit issues (including audit work on fair values)

· Planning/practice management/quality control issues

  • Assurance services, e.g. performance measurement or prospective financial information

Q3. Matters and evidence - 3 scenarios.

Likely to be several scenarios covering various Paper 2.5 level accounting standards, e.g:

  • Events after the balance sheet date
  • Provisions
  • Impairments
  • Earnings per share
  • Segment information
  • Related party disclosures
  • Deferred tax
  • Discontinued operations
  • Standard costing
  • Intangible assets
  • Revenue recognition
  • Borrowing costs

Q4. Audit reporting - Opening balances and Comparatives.

Q5. Professional and ethical matters / practice management, quality control issues scenario question.

Q6. Current issues, e.g:

  • Fraud and auditor liability
  • International convergence
  • Audit exemption for small companies
  • Risk-based auditing
  • Related parties
  • Corporate governance
  • Laws and regulation

ACCA 3.2(MYS) Exam Tips

Compulsory (must read) (80%-100%)

1. Real Estate Investment Trust (must know S4(a),S33,S34,S34(6) n S39)
2. Residence Status Individual + Islamic Finance (such as I-ijara n bai-Bithatman Ajal)
3. Alowance for increased export (OHQ,R&D)
4. Contract Payment (S107,S4A-WitHoldingTax)
5. Interest restriction
6. Company restructuring

Important (50%-80%)

1. Tax Planning for Individual (JA,separate assessment,all the relief,settlement,income splitting)
2. Personal Finance
3. Private Residence Exemption (RPC,Exchange,para 17(1)(a)
4. Tax Audit n Investigations
5. Labuan
6. Stamp Duty Exemption

If got time then read (30%-50%)

1. Club
2. Co-operation
3. Charitable Institution
4. Pioneeer, RA, Investment Tax Allowance
5. Property Development
6. Leasing

Another lecturer's spot:

Paper 3.2

1. REIT, Leasing, Property Development
2. Personel Finance
3. Incentive - Allowance for increased export, RA, OHQ, RPC, IPC
4. Withholding Tax (S109B, S107A), Reinvestment
5. Real Property Company
6. Interest Restriction
7. Tax planning for company (transfer of biz)
8. Tax planning for Individual (resident status, company and tax implication)

ACCA 3.3 Exam Tips

There will be new areas in the syllabus for June 2006;

· Ansoff's growth vector matrix

· BCG matrix

· Porter's five forces model

· Budgeting (short term planning)- heavily numerical with a small written element (performance measurement)

· Contribution based decision-making

· Practical aspects of pricing policy

· Performance evaluation – ROI and RI

· The learning effect

· The strategic framework – specifically a question based around the examiner’s recent article on “Business Strategy and Performance Models” (Student Accountant – April 2006)

ACCA 3.4 Exam Tips

Change Management – Lewin’s approaches to change,application of how an organisation can manage change using an unfreeze, change and refreeze approach . An article appearing in Student Accountant in November 2005 may be a useful indicator here.

Global business strategies

Systems Development – the examiner may look at alternative approaches to soft systems methodology, or perhaps look for a comparison or evaluation of different methods

E-commerce – this always creeps into questions, but a big question looking at the benefits and risks is possibly overdue

SWOT analysis – ability to determine the issues which affect the business using and internal and external focus

MacFarlan/Peppard’s Strategic grid – possible application to a case study with the comparison of competing projects

Intranet – development of a system to support internal operations

Business and IS/IT alignment

BPR and the implications of changing business operations

E-commerce – development of web sites and their impact on both business and individual customer usage

ACCA 3.5 Exam Tips

Section A

Manufacturing environment

· A discussion of the relative merits of different ways of making strategy

· Stakeholder analysis and objective setting

· Application of strategic analysis models

· Evaluation of strategic objectives, using the numbers included

· Marketing issues

Section B

· Marketing, including new product development

· Human resources.

· Globalisation strategy.

· Ethics and corporate social responsibility.

· Corporate governance issues

ACCA 3.6 Exam Tips

Section A

The preparation of a group income statement is due, as is the translation of foreign subsidiaries and cash flow statements.

-adjustment for 4 or 5 marks on another area such as pensions, financial instruments, assets 'held for sale' or incorrect accounting entries.

Section B

Possibilities for examination include:

• 'Events' questions such as shutdown of an operation, switch to IFRS, natural or deliberate disaster, bringing in areas such as: impairments, provisions, events after the balance sheet date, non-current assets held for sale, discontinued operations, pension scheme curtailment effects, etc

• 'Mixed' questions where a range of standards are covered in separate unrelated parts of the question, such as related parties, recognition and impairment of tangible and intangible assets, foreign currency transactions, revenue recognition, leases, changes in accounting policies or deferred tax.

• Single topic questions in more detail (theoretical aspects followed up with calculations) such as segment reporting, earnings per share, first-time adoption of IFRS (IFRS 1) or financial instruments (see examiner's articles below)

• Questions on topical areas, such as the continuing attempts to bring about international harmonisation and the effect on a company's accounts of applying IFRS, possibly linked with IFRS 1, recent exposure drafts on the planned changes to groups and provisions and share-based payment

• Group reorganisations, especially if question 1 is a cash flow statement question

• Performance and valuation measures, how they are changing and how they are affected by accounting policies often appear in the exam.

• A discussion question looking at current developments in corporate reporting. Topics that could appear here include: social and environmental reporting, Corporate Social Responsibility, business ethics, accounting standards for small and medium-sized entities and reporting on the internet.

ACCA 3.7 Exam Tips

Section A:

•Overseas NPV: Ability to perform a basic overseas NPV/FCF calculation. Including one off cash flows, annuities and perpetuity calculations and the knowledge of the specific issues that relate to foreign direct investment. perhaps combined with currency hedging or international cash management would seem a likely candidate for the compulsory section. The examiner will expect you to be able to discuss political risks in this context.

• Risk management: Currency Risk / Interest rate risk and hedging

• Company Valuation within the context of Merger and Acquisitions: A possible question that requires a valuation under various methods like NAV, DVM, P/E Ratio and FCFs. (maybe within the context of Going Private.) Also review the share for share exchange style questions.

• Corporate Restructuring:Valuation

Section B:

• Economic Value Added – EVA

• Dividend Policy

• Portfolio Theory and CAPM - summary and alpha tables

• International economics – I.M.F., Treasury Management. Balance of payments deficits.

• Adjusted Present Value:

• Free Cash Flow feature regularly as does Black Scholes.

The ultimate 3.1 guide

For many of those choosing to sit it, Paper 3.1 has become a stumbling block on the road to becoming a chartered certified accountant. This need not be the case.


The reason the pass rate has been so low is simple: the candidates are not giving the examiner, Kim Smith, what she is looking for.

Kim Smith has been explicit about what she expects from her candidates and how they should tackle her paper. She has written numerous articles in the magazine Student Accountant, some on technical topics (often followed by a discussion question on the same topic) and others on exam technique. These are top-priority reading for any student who wants to pass this paper: the examiner has set ideas about what she is looking for in a candidate’s answer, and the articles give us a unique insight into this. Don’t ignore these valuable resources.

Also high on the list of priorities are the examiner’s comments, which are often substantially longer than those of other examiners. You should take advantage of this excellent opportunity to ‘get to know the examiner’ better!

Danger
Many students sit Paper 3.1 at the same sitting as Paper 2.6 Audit and Internal Review. This is a dangerous strategy. It was not ACCA’s (nor the examiner’s) intention that the two papers be sat together. While there is a fair amount of overlap in terms of knowledge base, the skills being tested in the two papers are very different. Passing Paper 3.1 requires not just a solid audit and ethical foundation, but also a level of maturity and practical business experience to be able to make sensible professional commentary on the scenarios.

Standard format
Candidates have been fortunate in the past in that the paper has followed pretty much the same format since its inception. Based on the examiner’s comments at the Teachers’ Conference, the good news is that this format looks set to continue (although there is no guarantee):

Q1 Risks (audit, financial statement or business risks) and
audit evidence

Q2 Risks, again of any of the above types, and associated
controls

Q3 Audit matters to consider and audit evidence on several
Paper 2.5 accounting issues

Q4 Auditors’/assurance reports

Q5 Ethical, professional and quality control issues

Q6 Discussion question based on current auditing issues.


Questions 1 and 2 have often also included other aspects such as group auditing, audit strategy in a given scenario and performance measurement.

Risky business
The Paper 3.1 exam usually features at least one, if not two, scenarios with requirements relating to risk. Having so many past questions to attempt - and so many sittings’ worth of examiners’ comments to read - should make these a real mark winner, but many candidates fall down by discussing the wrong type of risk.

Audit risks (the most common) are, ultimately, risks that the audit opinion will be wrong for whatever reason. They are made up of inherent, control and detection risk, although that distinction, while it might be useful for generating ideas, is more of a paper 2.6 issue.

An example of an audit risk is that the value of a company’s perishable inventories might be overstated if held at cost.

Business risks are risks that the entity, not the auditor, will not achieve its objectives. Many of these translate into audit risks, hence the reason why the ‘Big 4’ auditors follow a business risk-driven approach to identifying audit risks.

However, this is not always the case. For example, an airline that does not refurbish its planes could lose custom in the future (a business risk) because flying in ‘old’ planes makes us think they are unsafe, but this has no direct impact on the financial statements in the current period. The above example of the inventories could also be mentioned as a business risk, but it would have to be worded differently, e.g. that the inventories might not be saleable because they are out of date or not stored properly.

For business risk, imagine yourself in the shoes of management, not the auditor: they might not be worried if their inventories are overstated in the balance sheet - they might just see it as accounting nonsense or might even be delighted because overstated inventories increase their profits - but they would be rightly concerned about inventories that are unsaleable.

Financial statement risks are risks that the financial statements will be wrong. Again, there is an overlap here with the other types of risk, but it is important in the exam to ‘sell’ your risks to the examiner as being financial statement ones. How? By explaining how the financial statements could be wrong if the risk occurred.

An example here is non-disclosure of a contingent liability affecting the company. In this example, the figures themselves are not affected (although they often are by financial statement risks), but there is a definite risk that the financial statements do not comply with accounting standards.
Also note that although the word ‘risk’ will appear in the requirement, it is absolutely certain that in an exam at this level, the examiner does not want you to explain the risk model in accordance with the ISA. So don’t do it.

Vague

Sometimes people leave the exam hall after sitting Paper 3.1 feeling confident – and then get an unpleasant surprise when results come out. Why is this?

The most common mistake in this paper is ‘not answering the question set’. For example, if there is a question about considerations as to whether to take on a particular assignment as an auditor, it needs to be answered in the context of the scenario in the question - very few, if any, marks will be given for listing out general considerations you may have learned. Another complaint from the examiner and markers is that points are often ‘too vague’. If you are asked to specify ‘principal audit work’, it’s not enough to just say, ‘review board minutes’ without saying what you are looking for and, whatever you do, don’t say ‘check’ unless you explain how you would do it!

Higher skills
One of the syllabus objectives of this paper is to ‘demonstrate the skills expected at Part 3’. One of those is the idea of demonstrating higher skills, and this is one of the things that distinguish the paper from Paper 2.6.

The general marking scheme for the paper awards ½ a mark for a point of knowledge, extended to 1 mark for application of that knowledge, and extended to 1½ marks for demonstrating a higher skill on the same point.

It is also worth noting that you would not be able to pass a question by listing a series of points of knowledge for ½ a mark each: marks are capped, and, indeed, the examiner explained at the conference that where a question is worded ‘Identify and explain…..’ (eg, business risks where there is ½ a mark for identification and 1 mark for explanation), in many cases the identification ½ mark cannot be given unless it is accompanied by an explanation, because the identification is implicit in the explanation itself.

Top tips for success at Paper 3.1
Read the examiner’s Student Accountant articles

Read through recent examiner’s comments

Pass paper 2.6 before attempting paper 3.1

Practise past exam questions and note down the points you didn’t get from the model answer

Get some practical business experience (if possible) and keep up to date by reading a quality newspaper

In your answer, try to go that one step further to bring out the implication, but don’t stress about trying to find it for every point

Don’t be scared of the discussion question: the marking scheme is generous

Make sure you take a calculator

Written by BPP Paper 3.1 tutors Ben Wheaton and Jennie Bruce

Straight from the horse's mouth

Find out what the ACCA examiners had to say at the Glasgow teachers' conference

Paper 1.1


Preparing Financial Statements
Examiner: Neil Stein
December pass rate: 61%


He outlined his core areas of the syllabus:
* Preparation of financial statements for limited liability companies for internal purposes and for publication.
* Preparation of financial statements for partnerships and sole traders (including incomplete records).
* Basic group accounts – consolidated balance sheet for company with one subsidiary.
* Book-keeping and accounting procedure.
* Accounting conventions and concepts.
* Interpretation of financial statements.
* Cash flow statements.
* Relevant accounting standards.

PAPER 1.2


Financial Information for Management
Examiner: David Forster
December pass rate: 52%
The key areas of the syllabus are:
* Cost classification and behaviour.
* Material, labour and overhead costs.
* Absorption and marginal costing.
* Process costing.
* Standard costing.
* CVP analysis.
* Limiting factors.
* Relevant costs for decision making.


Forster's aim is to ensure that every study session is tested within every exam. He revealed that section B questions are set first. Section A questions (MCQ) are set to complement the section B questions.

Paper 1.3

Examiner John Ball kicked off his session explaining the five key topics of the 1.3 syllabus. They are, he said:
1) Management and team development.
2) Recruitment and selection.
3) Training and development.
4) Motivation and leadership.
5) Effective communication.


For the next three sittings the paper will continue to follow the existing format. Question 1 is a compulsory scenario-based question and can draw from any part(s) of the syllabus. Questions 2 to 6 follow the five topics in the order in which they appear in the syllabus. Students choose four.


When it comes to exam technique, or the lack of it, Ball said there were some serious issues. He emphasised that making the assumption that experience and/or guesswork will suffice in a paper of this kind was "just not good enough". If he had his way, on the front of every exam paper it would say in big bold letters: 'Read the damn question!'
Many candidates are not addressing the theory/practice of the exam topics and some simply do not understand the words.


Ball stressed that the questions are carefully worded. "They are deliberate, if I name a writer I want that writer back, not someone else," he said.


On far too many scripts students also don't put down what question they have answered. The examiner pointed out that candidates need to guide the markers to where your marks are.


Ball was disappointed with the December 42 per cent pass rate. "There is no excuse for this. There is a body of literature such as model answers and passed papers." He felt Question 2 (the management roles question) was a gift. He also wondered how students could struggle with a question asking them about the purpose of an application form and what information was expected on it.

Paper 2.1


Information Systems
Examiner: Steve Skidmore
December pass rate: 51%


Looking at the good and bad in December 2005
The good:
* Models and modelling.
* Opportunities for computerisation.
* Stages in the SDLC
* Project network charts.
* Software packages.


The bad:
* Models and modelling.
* Standards and quality assurance.
* Measurement and monitors.
* Feasibility report.
* Project quality plan.

Paper 2.4


Financial Management and Control
Examiner: Tony Head
December pass rate: 44%


Examiner Tony Head's key areas of the syllabus are:
* Financial management objectives.
* Sources of finance.
* Capital investment appraisal.
* Costing systems and techniques.
* Standard costing and variance analysis.
* Budgeting and budgetary control.
* Performance measurement.

Paper 2.5

Paper 2.5 has traditionally had one of the better exam pass rates and December was no exception. Examiner Steve Scott was pleased with the 2 per cent jump on June to 53 per cent. In fact he revealed that a number of his markers thought the exam too easy.


However, he said both students and the ACCA's own Exam Review Board had felt the December questions were fair and for the most part on core topics.


Scott revealed many exam centres produced very high pass rates and there were some high individual marks. He was happy that the basics of important topics such as groups, company reporting and cash flows were well understood.


When it comes to failure he was concerned that many candidates only appear to study 'expected topics' and have no breadth or depth to their knowledge. "This meant question 3 and 5 were poorly answered," he explained. There also appears to be no progression from paper 1.1. And, by adopting a mechanical approach, they send the signal to markers that they have no real understanding of what they have calculated.


Add to this poor layout, confused referenced workings and aggregation of figures without workings and you can see why the other 47 per cent of sitters failed!


When it came to the important areas of the syllabus Scott pointed out that there was always going to be a question on group accounting and one on the preparation of financial statements.
Future papers will also see a greater emphasis on examinable recent standards.


Accounting principles are one of Scott's key topics. That includes the statement of principles, revenue recognition and substance of transactions (FRS5).


Also on his core list is the ability of candidates to deal with equity, debt and convertible debt.


The treatment of finance costs income statements and classification, and carrying value in the balance sheet are also on his list. He said questions may also specify the category of a financial instrument. Candidates will then be expected to deal with the carrying amount and any gain or loss.


Scott said there was a problem that many items he examines now come under FRS 25/26. His main advice is that the level of knowledge for these items is unchanged. He emphasised it was unlikely that irredeemable preference shares will be examined, but redeemable will.

Paper 2.6

Alan Lewin started by telling delegates at the conference that students who have 'done an audit' will do better in his exam. He then outlined the key areas of the exam:
* Professional ethics.
* Understanding the nature of auditing.
* Risk assessment and internal controls.
* Practical application of audit techniques.
* Newer areas including corporate governance, ISAs, etc.


Without stating the obvious he said there are just three diets left for this paper and he promised no major changes.

Lewin said his question style will remain scenario based, sometimes with five mark intros. The whole syllabus will be examined, Lewin stressed. However, there are 27 syllabus areas and he only has 18 questions left.


Lewin pointed out that there were ways for candidates to improve their chances of passing. "They must practice clear and precise presentation," he said. Lewin went on by saying student have to practise answering questions in full.


When reading model answers in the revision phase, he suggested it will help to write down the points that you have missed. Lewin pleaded for candidates in June to write legibly and said that a clear heading does assist in making a point clearly.

Paper 3.1

Examiner Kim Smith is a passionate woman when it comes to auditing and she came to the Teachers' Conference desperate to understand why her paper pass rate was so low this time around. "We are now nine sessions on and I will keep on examining the same topic areas, I just wish I didn't have to see the same students sitting this paper again and again."


There are, she explained, lots of reasons why students are failing the paper, the most common one being not answering the question set. Students are also dealing with generalities instead of specifics.


Another problem is the 'auto pilot' candidate. This is the students who see a word and away they go. Regurgitation of the text book or simply copying out the question details gets you zero marks!


Smith's markers have adopted special acronyms for the reason pages and pages of a script have no mark on them!
There is what you don't want on your script:
* TV (too vague).
* CQ (contradicts question).
* X (wrong!) .
* So? (failure to conclude).


Smith was shocked with how poorly candidates were performing – she believes her paper is very predictable. She does want students to be better read. "They can't just rely on Student Accountant and a manual," she stressed. That is especially true when it comes to current issues.


She expects students to consolidate their 2.6 knowledge and expand on it. There is a problem here, however, as some students could actually be sitting papers 2.6 (the other auditing paper) and 3.1 at the same time.


Students also had to understand there aren't many rote learning marks available at 3.1.


Smith said to some extent her hands are tied by DTI regulations: "This is the last auditing exam a trainee sits and there are standards we have to maintain."

Paper 3.3


The key areas of Johnson's paper are:
* Management accounting systems.
* Performance indicators.
* Performance assessment.
* Process costing.

The examiner asked students to avoid question spotting. "Given that 60 marks are compulsory it is a risky strategy to question spot," he told delegates to the conference.


Johnson acknowledged that those three hours in the exam hall can be the fastest three hours of you life.


During the Q&A session he also said students should go back more than six months when looking for relevant articles in Student Accountant.


There have been some recent additions to the syllabus. From June 2006 students can be examined on:
* Ansoff's grwoth vecxtor matrix.
* Boston Consulting group matrix.
* Porter's five forces model.


Turning to the December exam he felt many candidates still entered the exam hall inadequately prepared. Johnson was concerned that many PQs lack the lower level (assumed) knowledge. The also had the sense of students playing the wrong options.

PAPER 3.4


Business Information Management
Examiner: George Bakehouse
December pass rate: 46%


Bakehouse provided the key areas of the paper:
* Organisational information requirements.
* Knowledge management and information systems.
* IS and the strategic planning process.
* Business systems, systems thinking and systems analysis.
* Gap analysis and business case development.
* IS and competitive position.
* Electronic commerce, internet as a strategic business tool.
* Implementing change.
* Impact of IT on work practices.

Paper 3.5


Examiner Ralph Bedrock set his first paper in December 2003. During that time the paper's structure has remained the same and pass rates have consistently remained above 50 per cent.


He said the key skills remain strategic analysis, choice and implementation. The problem for 3.5 sitters is centred round the candidates' ability (or inability) to choose and use appropriate models. He wanted students to take the opportunity to explore new areas and he couldn't hide his disappointment that students avoided new topics which they deemed 'difficult'.


Turning to the December sitting Bedrock the bulk of those who pass (80 per cent) achieve marks between 50 and 60 per cent.
He said that as a general rule of thumb candidates who don't 'pass' the compulsory question generally fail 3.5. His big complaint was question hopping, where students answer parts A and B of Question 1 and then go onto an option question. They then return and answer part 1C before moving onto another optional question. Finally part 1D is answered. This all becomes very complicated for markers - the people you really want to impress.

Paper 3.6

The average pass rates world wide for this paper is 50 per cent. However, Holt revealed that there are significant differences in centre pass rates.


A major factor which causes failure, he said, is the lack of understanding. For instance Holt is amazed at the number of students who don't know the difference between an associate and subsidiary.
Other reasons for failure were students not reading widely enough and poor study skills.


Holt said if he asks for a report then that's what he wants. He stressed that marks are even allocated for the layout.


He also warned students that if they perform poorly on a question they can expect that subject area to reappear! Deferred tax and pensions comes to mind here.


Holt explained that FRED 32 will keep popping up. FREESE is also important (he said that about 13 times). Even the OFR is still examinable. "There are lots of issues about its demise," he said.
Holt stressed that every marginal script was looked at (between 45 and 50 per cent) to see if students should pass.


Students simply don't help themselves here if they have only answered three out of four questions. Holt is concerned at the number of candidates who are not attempting the correct number of questions.

Paper 3.7


Examiner Scott Goddard is worried he is going soft in his old age. At 49 per cent this is the best performance of any cohort sitting a Goddard exam. Apparently, the only people who complained were the marking team, who had more marks to add up this time around.


Interestingly, the next three papers will be the last Goddard sets for the ACCA – he will not be an examiner for the new syllabus.


He stressed that this final ACCA paper was equivalent to a masters degree, which is not always realised by candidates. Too many exam papers are filled with superficial answers and low level analysis, he said. And he claimed that there was often poor use of information and data in the question. Another worry was the lack of evidence of reading or use of real-world examples. "Have students not heard of the Financial Times and The Economist?" he asked.


December saw a much better performance by candidates compared to June. Good marks were earned on the compulsory questions (which was felt to be more user-friendly). Question 1 was the best answered question, with students showing a good understanding of investment decisions. There were some problems with the timing of cash flows and some confusion about risk and the cost of capital. Goddard also pointed to the 12 marks available for discussion.


The key five areas of the syllabus are not going to change in the three exams left, and they are:


* Investment decisions.
* Risk analysis.
* Global financial management.
* Treasury management and financial forecasting.
* Strategy formulation.


Goddard promises a rough policy of covering all these every four sittings. His advice to students was to focus on past papers and solutions for guidance. He pleaded with them not to produce ridiculous answers, eg options prices in excess of the value of the underlying asset. Candidates also had to attempt all parts of questions and display analytical skills. Ultimately, he and his 31 markers want to be provided with evidence that you are capable of offering good professional advice.